RYAN STANDER
  • Home
  • Artist Statement
  • Photography
    • Collodion
    • Florence
    • Bakken
    • Instagram
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • Earlier
    • Elevator Series
    • Topos/Chora
      • About Topos/Chora & PKAP
    • Alternative Processes
      • Cyprus Van Dykes
      • On Wood
      • Cyanotype Landscapes
    • Building Series
  • Printmaking
    • Hints, Allegations, and Things Left Unsaid
    • Visual Analogues
    • American Ideals
    • Contested Spaces
    • The Substance of Things Seen
  • Mixed Media
    • Book Arts
      • Photobooks
      • Photograph Album Vols. 1 & 2
      • MFA Books
    • Archival Turn Work
    • Archival Turn Statement
    • Archival Turn Reception
  • Store
  • Bio
  • Contact
  • Links & Resources
  • Student Work
  • Home
  • Artist Statement
  • Photography
    • Collodion
    • Florence
    • Bakken
    • Instagram
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • Earlier
    • Elevator Series
    • Topos/Chora
      • About Topos/Chora & PKAP
    • Alternative Processes
      • Cyprus Van Dykes
      • On Wood
      • Cyanotype Landscapes
    • Building Series
  • Printmaking
    • Hints, Allegations, and Things Left Unsaid
    • Visual Analogues
    • American Ideals
    • Contested Spaces
    • The Substance of Things Seen
  • Mixed Media
    • Book Arts
      • Photobooks
      • Photograph Album Vols. 1 & 2
      • MFA Books
    • Archival Turn Work
    • Archival Turn Statement
    • Archival Turn Reception
  • Store
  • Bio
  • Contact
  • Links & Resources
  • Student Work
Search

Questioning God In The Psalms.5

12/19/2011

0 Comments

 
Today I want to look at Psalm 13 and 62.

Psalm 13 is striking because of the sheer repetition of the “How long?” question. The question is employed four times in the first two verses asking about God’s memory of the psalmist, God’s presence/absence, the Psalmist’s resulting sorrow from God’s absence and forgetfulness, and the proximity of the Psalmist’s enemies. In this psalm, we can clearly see Westermann’s three participants. Though the three are distinct, they are inseparable.[1]

A polite reading suggests that the psalmist is asking for a time when life will return to the good. But if we peer closer and consider the lack of reference to sin or guilt again, we perceive an innocence on the part of the psalmist. Thus the blame is directed squarely at Yahweh for his state. The psalmist proceeds to hurl three petitionary imperatives Yahweh’s way in verse 3 to “consider,” “answer,” and “enlighten.” The psalmist also gives Yahweh a motivation, (or I will sleep the sleep of death) and the subsequent results of God’s continued inaction would result in the enemies triumphing over the Psalmist and ultimately of Yahweh’s self through his covenantal solidarity with the Psalmist.

While the psalmist bemoans his current state of physical and emotional turmoil, he can still find the strength in Yahweh’s previous actions with him to offer a hope that Yahweh will once again deal “bountifully with him.”[2] There is no abandonment of God, but recalling God’s past actions, for the psalmist’s own faith strengthening benefit but for God’s apparent memory slip. This recollection before God, gives him a renewed vigor to wait until the reprieve comes in God’s saving actions. Mays notes that the Psalm is a direct address to God utilizing the “name that God has given the people for God as self-revelation...thus bestowing the possibility and promise of prayer.”[3] Even in the address to God, the psalmist is being faithful to God’s previous actions, calls God to the same focus of faithfulness to their partnership.


Psalm 62 contains an interesting usage within the collection of questions. The psalm is an avowal of trust in Yahweh as the psalmist’s fortress despite the brutal warlike imagery of the enemies who besiege the walls of the city.[4] “How long will you assail a person, will you batter your victim, all of you, as you would a leaning wall, a tottering fence?”

Here we see all three of Westermann’s participants present, but who is responsible for what? If we lift up the secondary implications, we begin to see that the same question may be indirectly addressed to Yahweh.[5] In this suggestion, God would be implicated by his absence for what befell the individual. And yet, I wonder can the question be directed at God? God is the subject of the immediately preceding verses and not until after verse 3 are the enemies mentioned. If the question is directed primarily at God, God would seem to be culpable for what appeared to be a lapse of protection and forgetfulness of the covenant.


[1] James L. Mays, The Lord Reigns: A Theological Handbook to the Psalms, (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1994), 55.
[2] Craigie, 141.
[3] James L. Mays, Psalms, Interpretation, (Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 1989), 78.
[4] Marvin E. Tate, Psalms: 51-100, Word Biblical Commentary, Vol. 20. (Dallas: Word Books, 1990), 121.
[5] Brueggemann, Theology of the Old Testament, 319.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Ryan Stander

    Archives

    January 2018
    November 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    May 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    November 2010
    January 2009
    May 2008
    April 2008
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007

    Categories

    All
    Advertising
    Archaeology
    Architecture
    Archival Turn
    Art
    Artists
    Biblical Study
    Book Arts
    Book Reviews
    Books
    Cabinet Cards
    Canada
    Conferences
    Creativity
    Education
    Ethics
    Evangelicalism
    Exhibitions
    Exhibits
    Favorites
    Film
    Grad School
    History
    Individualism
    Iowa
    Lament
    Landscape
    Liturgy
    Memory
    Mfa
    Mourning Photography
    Music
    New Topographics
    North Dakota
    Oil
    Openings
    P.c.n.j.
    Photographic Objects
    Photography
    Photography History
    Pkap
    Place
    Print Exchanges
    Printmaking
    Psalms
    Randomness
    Student Work
    Sundog Multiples
    Teaching
    Theologizing
    Theology And The Arts
    Tintypes
    Tradition
    Und
    Vernacular Photography
    Visiting Artists
    Vocation

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Artist Statement
  • Photography
    • Collodion
    • Florence
    • Bakken
    • Instagram
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • Earlier
    • Elevator Series
    • Topos/Chora
      • About Topos/Chora & PKAP
    • Alternative Processes
      • Cyprus Van Dykes
      • On Wood
      • Cyanotype Landscapes
    • Building Series
  • Printmaking
    • Hints, Allegations, and Things Left Unsaid
    • Visual Analogues
    • American Ideals
    • Contested Spaces
    • The Substance of Things Seen
  • Mixed Media
    • Book Arts
      • Photobooks
      • Photograph Album Vols. 1 & 2
      • MFA Books
    • Archival Turn Work
    • Archival Turn Statement
    • Archival Turn Reception
  • Store
  • Bio
  • Contact
  • Links & Resources
  • Student Work